“昨天的要坚持下去，今天的要有所深化，明天的要取得更大成效”。不做寅吃卯粮、击鼓传花的虚浮之举，而是“甘于做铺垫性的工作，甘于抓未成之事”。
Что думаешь? Оцени!
，推荐阅读搜狗输入法下载获取更多信息
The real annoying thing about Opus 4.6/Codex 5.3 is that it’s impossible to publicly say “Opus 4.5 (and the models that came after it) are an order of magnitude better than coding LLMs released just months before it” without sounding like an AI hype booster clickbaiting, but it’s the counterintuitive truth to my personal frustration. I have been trying to break this damn model by giving it complex tasks that would take me months to do by myself despite my coding pedigree but Opus and Codex keep doing them correctly. On Hacker News I was accused of said clickbaiting when making a similar statement with accusations of “I haven’t had success with Opus 4.5 so you must be lying.” The remedy to this skepticism is to provide more evidence in addition to greater checks and balances, but what can you do if people refuse to believe your evidence?
8001: AnQiCMS 访问端口